Feature2025·39m·7.3

Armed Only with a Camera: The Life and Death of Brent Renaud

Documentary

On March 13, 2022, filmmaker Brent Renaud was killed by Russian soldiers, the first American journalist to die while reporting on the war in Ukraine. His younger brother and collaborator, Craig Renaud, recovered Brent’s body and his final recordings from Ukraine and brought them back to their childhood home in Arkansas. As Brent’s journey to his final resting place unfolds, the film chronicles the years he and his brother spent covering some of the world’s most dangerous conflicts.

Play now

Cast

Brent Renaud

Self

Craig Renaud

Self

Jon Alpert

Self

Juan Arredondo

Self

Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Self (archival footage)

Anderson Cooper

Self (archival footage)

Details

Status
Released
Original language
English
Languages
English, Spanish
Budget
Revenue
Age rating
Quality
4K UHD · HDR10 · Dolby Vision
Production
HBO Documentary FilmsDowntown Community Television CenterRenaud Brothers Films

Crew

Director

Brent Renaud

Brent Renaud

Director of Photography

Craig Renaud

Director of Photography

Jon Alpert

Director of Photography

Brent Renaud

Editor

Craig Renaud

Editor

Jon Alpert

Editor

Gallery

Reviews

CinemaSerf

7/4/2026

6.0

Hmmm. I wasn't sure about this film. On the face of it, it provides us with a poignant critique of the dangers faced, time immemorial, by wartime journalists. Since the Crimean War, if not before, people have donned armbands or carried accreditation that is all the armour they have when they enter zones that any sane person would avoid like the plague. For just as long, they have been perishing at the hands of bullets and bombs. The fact that little of that risk appears to have been mitigated by Kevlar and PRESS in big letters written on it is writ large here in this tribute to American Brent Renaud who was shot by Russian forces whilst reporting from the Ukraine in 2022. This was a man whose career was spent in many of the world's disaster zones from Haiti and Somalia to Chicago and Kiev, and each time he has used his intimate photography to convey something of the lawlessness and pitiable situations left by natural diasters or by the results of protracted conflict. That's the part that works effectively. It's the way in which this is mingled in with the star spangled banner aspects that didn't sit so well with me. He was clearly a brave man, but what we see in front of the camera needed to be used far more carefully to emphasise the predicments and horrors faced by the victims, not to commemorate his photographic achievements. Why couldn't it have focussed more on the man himself, the difficulties faced organising the logistics of getting his work safely done; of the collegiate work done by international journalists to support each other and of the frequent corruption faced by people working in this dangerous industry striving to get us a truth? It's a fitting tribute to a man for his family's consumption, but for a wider world I'm not sure if it wasn't just a little lacking in objectivity.